|Message: RE: command based scoring||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Thanks for your feed back. > Is it possible via scorer to flag particules passing > threw a particular volume ? You may define a scoring mesh as such that a surface of the mesh is the same as the volume you want to score the flux. Then, use one of the flux scorer we offer with a particle filter. > is t possible to extend > scoring geometry to fit cylinder or sphere ? Cylindrical mesh is under development. It should be released at the next public release, we expect. Spherical mesh takes a bit more time, since we currently do not have replica functionality for sphere. Makoto > -----Original Message----- > From: ludovic Ferrer [mailto:email@example.com] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:36 PM > To: publichypernews > Subject: command based scoring > > *** Discussion title: User Requirements > Email replies to PublicHyperNews@slac.stanford.edu must include: > In-Reply-To: <"/userreqs/31"@geant4-hn.slac.stanford.edu> > Subject: ...change this to be about your reply. > > Hi, you asked user's feeling about your new scoring approach based on > command. I have just tried it with Gate ... That's pretty cool. I have > just test on a simple example. But, I get very easily a deposited dose > map ...great great. some questions : Is it possible via scorer to flag > particules passing threw a particular volume ? is t possible to extend > scoring geometry to fit cylinder or sphere ? that could be > convenient in > some cases... > > Once again ... great job >
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|