Message: Re: PAI model versus QGSP_BIC_EMY Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

Feedback Re: PAI model versus QGSP_BIC_EMY 

Forum: Physics List
Re: None PAI model versus QGSP_BIC_EMY (Filip Krizek)
Re: Idea Re: PAI model versus QGSP_BIC_EMY (Vladimir Ivanchenko)
Date: 23 Jul, 2015
From: Filip Krizek <Filip Krizek>

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 23:02:50 GMT, Vladimir Ivanchenko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> sorry for the late answer. The difference in your plot is really big. Can you, please, confirm these numbers in $G4INSTALL/examples/extended/electromagnetic/TestEm8 ?
> 
> We recently fix some problems for running in multi-threaded mode of PAI model. These fixes are available in 10.2beta release and in 10.1patch02. 
> 
> VI
> 

Dear Vladimir,

Indeed you were right.   The difference between  PAI model and other models appears in the older version of geant (4.9.6.p02) I was using.  Yesterday I installed the newest version ( 4.10.01.p02) and the reported difference is gone, so PAI model is now consistent with other data sets. Thanks.
                                            Cheers
                                                       Filip

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: PAI model versus QGSP_BIC_EMY"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]