|Message: gamma transmission -- physics models incorrect for thick materials||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I'm trying to reproduce a measurement and calculation using Geant4 to expand our design. At the basic level I have a point 60Co source located behind a concrete wall and I'm trying to measure the dose on the other side of the wall.
I've tried both the GPS 60Co source and a user defined 60Co source (created by me in PrimaryGeneratorAction). I have a 50x50x50 cm water cube on the other side of the concrete which is set as a scoring volume. The concrete is defined using the NIST database (G4_CONCRETE).
I've tried the physics models: 1) 'Shielding' model, 2) 'EmStandardPhysics_option3', and 3) 'EmStandardPhysics_option3+EmExtraPhysics', they all give the same results.
To determine the 'transmission' I take the ratio of the dose (E/mass) between runs with and without the wall present. I then do this for multiple thicknesses of the wall.
I get the attached results. After about 80 cm the MC results diverge from the calculation. The calculation takes 'build-up' (secondaries produced by the gammas from the decay) into account and has been validated by measurement.
Does anyone have any idea why Geant4 (10.1) would not be able to do this?
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|