Message: Re: Secondaries from heavy-ion projectiles with different physics lists Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Secondaries from heavy-ion projectiles with different physics lists 

Forum: Physics List
Re: None Secondaries from heavy-ion projectiles with different physics lists (Mark Looper)
Re: Idea Re: Secondaries from heavy-ion projectiles with different physics lists (Vladimir Ivanchenko)
Date: 16 Jul, 2013
From: Mark Looper <Mark Looper>

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:16:24 GMT, Vladimir Ivanchenko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> would it be possible to repeat the study using Geant4 10.beta recently available?

That is, you'd like to see a similar plot using the updated version's QBBC(_EMZ) reference physics list, right?

>  The reason is that FTF ion/ion interaction in previous version of Geant4 was very preliminary (not all features were in). Now this model is released in desired form, so some differences with previous results are expected. If we speak about Binary cascade for ion/ion interaction E>2 GeV/u is away of model assumptions, the model should not properly forhigher energies.
> 
> VI
> 

What worried me was the big jump in yield at about 2 GeV/u for the QBBC_EMZ physics list -- SHIELDING_LIV at least looked smooth there. But if you say it's not applicable, then it's not applicable, and I'll give the new QBBC a try. Watch this space; thanks!

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Secondaries from heavy-ion projectiles with different physics lists"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]