|Message: Re: Cross Section Data Base||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Also i'd like to find new validation of interaction protons with fissile U targets, may be anybody can help me, i need in integral results of leaking neutrons not bouble differential cross section. I find only Vasilkov experiment, which published in "Atomic energy",44,4,1978 and Tunnicliffe P.R., Childey B.G., Fraser J.S.,Report on the International Conf. on Accelerators in Chalk River. - Canada, 1976.
I have bad validation of FTF_BIC and FTFP_BERT with them, FTFP_BERT gives similar results for Pu239 productions in Uranium target(Vasilkov experiment), but different results in total number of fission processes(Vasilkov experiment). Tunnicliffe P.R. gives integral leaked neutrons and his results are not comparable with my simulation.
For other materials (not fissile) with 300-700 Mev protons i have got equal results. Has anybody can give me link to sourse for modern validation integral experiments for Uranium thick targets (100-1000MeV), or i need to integrate Double Cross Section Data?
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|