|Message: polarized 10 MeV neutrons||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I am trying to simulate polarized 10 MeV neutrons produced by a polarized gamma beam.
In my physics list, I so far mainly use pre-made physics lists: G4EmLivermorePolarizedPhysics and HadronPhysicsQGSP_BERT_HP
Also, I add some other processes to hadronic based on Hadr01 example, as well as decay.
I am still in process of building/polishing/finalizing the simulation, no red flags brought up by this choice yet, but it surely takes forever to run.
Are these lists a good choice for my energy? Is using regular polarized compton, etc instead of the livermore stuff and HadronPhysicsQGSP_BERT instead of HadronPhysicsQGSP_BERT_HP possible?
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|