Message: Re: Nuclear excitation & Rutherford Backscattering Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Nuclear excitation & Rutherford Backscattering 

Forum: Physics List
Re: Question Nuclear excitation & Rutherford Backscattering (Marouan EL YAKOUBI )
Re: Idea Re: Nuclear excitation & Rutherford Backscattering (Vladimir Ivanchenko)
Re: None Re: Nuclear excitation & Rutherford Backscattering (Marcus Mendenhall)
Date: 08 Jan, 2011
From: Robert Weller <Robert Weller>

Marcus is probably right on this. It was 3 MeV alphas on C wasn't it?  See:

http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/figures/16figs/16_08_1993.pdf

Bob 

On Jan 8, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Marcus Mendenhall wrote:

> 
> *** Discussion title: Physics List
> 
> I was originally thinking about suggesting TestEm7, too, but realized
> that the request is a bit more complex.
> 
> Few-MeV alphas on carbon, scattering at back angles, involve strong
> mixing of the hadronic and electromagnetic component. I think nuclear
> structure plays a strong part here, and so if high-accuracy is needed,
> it may not be easy to get without detailed nuclear scattering cross
> section information.
> 
> It really depends on what is needed from the calculation.
> 
> Marcus
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit this GEANT4 at hypernews.slac.stanford.edu message (to reply or unsubscribe) at: 
> http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/phys-list/602/1/1.html 

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Nuclear excitation & Rutherford Backscattering"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]