Message: Re: FLUKA and MICAP instead of GHEISHA Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: FLUKA and MICAP instead of GHEISHA 

Keywords: fluka micap
Forum: Physics List
Re: Question FLUKA and MICAP instead of GHEISHA (Jeremy McCormick)
Re: None Re: FLUKA and MICAP instead of GHEISHA (Wellisch, J.P.)
Date: 16 Feb, 2004
From: Jeremy McCormick <Jeremy McCormick>

Saying that GEISHA is the default was incorrect on my part. I seem to have Geant3 on the brain. :)

I am aware of the hadronic lists page. I assume these have a correspondence with the new hadronic_lists/lists in Geant4 6.0.

I am currently using LHEP with Packaging in our applications, similar to Mokka v02-03.

The specific sitation I am wondering about is "plugging in" either the FLUKA or MICAPS physics models? These were specifically mentioned to me by a researcher here.

I know FLUKA can be interfaced with the FLUGG C++ software. However, this requires "ripping out" a lot of the Geant4 guts in the application. I believe MICAPS is FORTRAN-only with no existent C++ interface.

Perhaps we should stick with the hadronic physics lists and not bother with these two packages. As you pointed out, there are a wide variety of internal models to choose from with a thorough set of use cases.

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 None: Re: FLUKA and MICAP instead of GHEISHA   (Wellisch, J.P. - 16 Feb, 2004)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: FLUKA and MICAP instead of GHEISHA"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews

[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]