Message: Re: highly un reasonable positron penetration depth in Fe. (LowEnergy, Penelope and default) Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: highly un reasonable positron penetration depth in Fe. (LowEnergy, Penelope and default) 

Forum: Physics List
Re: Question highly un reasonable positron penetration depth in Fe. (LowEnergy, Penelope and default) (Or Chen)
Re: None Re: highly un reasonable positron penetration depth in Fe. (LowEnergy, Penelope and default) (michel maire)
Re: Disagree Re: highly un reasonable positron penetration depth in Fe. (LowEnergy, Penelope and default) (Or Chen)
Date: 29 Jul, 2008
From: Or Chen <Or Chen>

Checked it again and now I get 20*um when running the example with you're commands, only I changed Iron to G4_Fe because it didn't recognize Iron as a valid material name - could this be a problem?

Thanks allot for the big help, Or.

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: highly un reasonable positron penetration depth in Fe. (LowEnergy, Penelope and default)"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]