|Message: Re: delta electron generated by muon through Silicon||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 09:47:14 GMT, JungEun Elena Suh wrote:
> Hello, > > I want to simulate delta ray production with muon go though silicon > sensor. I'm using standard Em physics (G4EmStandardPhysics) and it was > hard to see the delta electrons. So I found a suggestion from this > thread and changed the production cut to 100nm (well I don't know if > this value is good enough. Of course I'll try various values.) with > setcut command. (like /run/setCut 0.1 um) > > And here is my question. If I want to obtain realistic result, is it > better to set this value extremely small? Like 1nm... or is there any > limitation? Or is it better to set the value larger than 100nm for some > reasons? I'm new to this kind of simulation, so I hope this question is > not so ridiculous. > > Thank you in advance! > > J.E.Suh >
TestEm18 is a kind of tutorial : its output describes the various contributions of energy lost by primary particle. You may start to play with it, with macro similar to the attached one.