|Message: How best to simulate radiation||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Firstly, apologies if this is the wrong forum and apologies for the long post.|
I am trying to simulate the interactions between low energy beta radiation and nanoparticles suspended in a water medium. These nanoparticles are small, with diameters ranging from 5 to 25 nm.
I am unsure of how best to set up my physics for this simulation.
Of particular concern is how the radiation will interact with the boundaries of my nanoparticles. Geant4 does a lot of clever things at boundaries, which I imagine doesn't impact larger scale simulations, however in my nanoscale simulations the physics seems heavily dominated by these boundary effects. I am aware of the fact that, for example, only single scattering and not multiple scattering occurs at boundaries.
I've outlined a more detailed description of my simulation setup and the issues that concern me below. I really value your input.
I have a cubic volume of side length 200 nm, filled with water. Within it I have spherical daughter volumes which represent nanoparticles, they range from 5 to 25 nm in diameter. I have a point source located on the surface of each nanoparticle. The point source emits e- particles isotropically with energies ranging from 100 eV to 1 MeV according to a predefined spectrum.
To demonstrate the effect I'm concerned about more clearly, I've replaced the aforementioned geometries with a box nested within another box, both filled with water. The attached figure is a 2D histogram of the number of hits recorded, one can clearly see the outline of the boundary.
One can see that the effect is more intense at the corners of the inner box.
Because my world is small, and I really care about the accuracy of the nanoscale interactions, my cuts should be as small as possible. So I have set them to 1 nm.
The effect of concern occurs when I just I have electron ionisation enabled (Penelope), so I'll just leave it at that for now. I've varied the eIoni parameters finalRange, linLossLimit and dRoverRange over a range of values but can't seem to minimise the boundary effect.
If it's relevant, my intended msc parameters are:
/process/msc/Skin 1 // my program won't accept a value of 0
I'm also using 500 bins for DEDX and Lamba binning, ranging from 100 eV to 1 GeV
My questions are:
1) Can I, and also should I, try and disable Geant4's clever treatment of boundaries to try and more consistently model the nanoscale interactions occurring?
2) How would you set up the physics for my nanoparticle geometry? Do my choices seem reasonable?
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|