|Message: Radiative muon decay||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
The PDG lists the radiative muon decay channel with a branching ratio of (1.4+-.4)%, with the note: for gamma energies > 10MeV (presumably in the muon rest frame). This decay is mu+ => e+ anti_nu_mu nu_e gamma.
This channel is not implemented in the normal Decay process, but is included in DecayWithSpin. Unfortunately, its branching ratio is much too small -- it is 1.4% for ALL gammas, which makes it about 0.08% for energy > 10MeV. So it looks to me like the note was not noticed.
If I assume the energy distribution is correct, then the overall branching ratio is about 24%. That's quite large and cannot reasonably be ignored. Why is the conventional wisdom "muons decay into an electron plus two neutrinos", when a quarter of the time they don't?
This can be a serious error for experiments involving muon decay backgrounds, because for high-energy muons, those gammas from ~24% of the decays get boosted to significant energies. Even for stopped muons, some 5-10% of the decays have gammas above the pair-production threshold. Surely many experiments ought to see this....
Does anybody know the real story here? What should we do about it? IMHO the Decay process is in error by omitting a channel with a branching ratio of ~24%, as is DecayWithSpin.
(Note there is no obvious forum for discussing Decay processes; this one seems like the best.)
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|