|Message: Re: /gun/ion 26 56 0||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, hepg wrote: > *** Discussion title: Particles > Email replies to PublicHyperNews@slac.stanford.edu must include: > In-Reply-To: <"/particles/240"@geant4-hn.slac.stanford.edu> > Subject: ...change this to be about your reply. > > Hi experts, > When I shoot Fe atom to the calorimeter, I found that the energy > deposite is also substantial, though less than bare Fe nucleus. But > it's almost the same as Fe +2 or Fe +3 ions. Anything wrong? > Hello, We are using effective change approach assuming equilibrium betwen ion change state and the media. In that case initial change state of the ion will not change results. In a calorimeter this approach seems to be reasonable, in gases may be not so accurate. VI
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|