Message: Re: /gun/ion 26 56 0 Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: /gun/ion 26 56 0 

Forum: Particles
Re: None /gun/ion 26 56 0 (hepg)
Date: 29 Apr, 2006
From: Vladimir Ivantchenko <vnivanch@mail.cern.ch>

On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, hepg wrote:

> *** Discussion title: Particles
> Email replies to PublicHyperNews@slac.stanford.edu must include:
>   In-Reply-To: <"/particles/240"@geant4-hn.slac.stanford.edu>
>   Subject: ...change this to be about your reply.
> 
> Hi experts,
>     When I shoot Fe atom to the calorimeter, I found that the energy
> deposite is also substantial, though less than bare Fe nucleus. But
> it's almost the same as Fe +2 or Fe +3 ions. Anything wrong?
> 


Hello,

We are using effective change approach assuming equilibrium betwen ion 
change state and the media. In that case initial change state of the ion 
will not change results. In a calorimeter this approach seems to be 
reasonable, in gases may be not so accurate.

VI  

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: /gun/ion 26 56 0"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]