|Message: Re: Optical Photons Not Propagating Down WLS Fibre||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Hi Peter, thanks for the quick reply, sorry for my delay.
> Hi Emile, > > > I would expect more photons to be hitting > > the detector for water than for air. > > What makes you expect this?
I would expect this result based on Snells law. The scintillator has a refractive index of ~1.52. Air has a refractive index of 1, and water of ~1.33. For photons to enter the fibre, they must be entering at an angle less than the critical angle of the interface, determined by arcsin(n2/n1), which for air is ~41 degrees, and for water is ~61 degrees.
This would lead me to expect that more photons would be entering the fibre for water than they would for air, which we do see in the simulation.
What we're not seeing is the photons then staying in the WLS fibre, which I would expect based on the outer layers having successively larger refractive indices than the inner layers (leading to no total reflection when the photon is entering the fibre, and probable total internal reflection once the photon is inside, I would assume).
Is my logic above correct? If so, are there any other factors that might be allowing the photons to escape the fibre as they are?
> > > I currently have the volumes nested (gap within scintillator, fibre > > within gap), and am not implementing any optical surfaces between them. > > I'm a relatively new user of Geant4, is there something else I have to > > do to see the expected photon behavior? > > No, what you are doing is fine. Except, of course, no real surface is so > perfectly, mathematically smooth as is the case with your geometry. > > Best regards, Peter >
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|