|Message: Why does defining a primitive scorer change optical physics processes?||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
In trying to model the scintillation and Cerenkov photons created by gamma rays in an optical fiber, I stumbled across an interesting problem.|
Unbelievable but true, the optical processes in my code appear to change when a primitive scorer is defined. This does not involve recompiling the code, it does not even involved defining the quantity or particle to be scored.
Strangely, simply uncommenting line 91 in my display.txt macro file (which defines the scorer) seems to prevent all internal reflection in the optical fiber I'm modeling.
Visualization of the output with the box mesh scorer defined and not defined are attached to this message along with the display macro and the macro that defines the box mesh scorer.
Any ideas on what is causing this? If I can't use a primitive scorer, how could record the number of photons escaping from the end of the fiber? Create a new volume and make it a sensitive detector?
thanks for any advice or guidance?
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|