|Message: Re: Optical photons and energy conservation||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
> In a latter design I replaced the embedded sphere with a thin tube of > BC404 placed at the end of the CsI tube. The source is now external and, > at sufficiently high energies, deposits energy in both scintillators. > The problem is that now a) the sum of the electron energy deposited in > the BC404+CsI exceeds the beam energy, and I have found that this > discrepancy grows as I manually increase the light yield.
The scintillation process and the other processes leading to an energy loss have nothing in common (except that the scintillation process uses the energy lost to calculate the number of photons). I have no explanation why the light yield can affect the energy depostion - if you don't count the optical photons' energy.
> I read the manual on optical processes and am not counting the optical > photon energies (though the fact the amount that total deposited energy > exceeds the beam energy depends on the value I choose for the light > yield bothers me).
Yes, something is strange ....
> Do I need to explicitly specify the boundary between > the two dielectrics (the manual seems to indicate no - in that case it > is only a matter of the different indices of refraction).
Perhaps something is wrong in your PhysicsList or how you tally the energy loss.