|Message: Re: fStopAndKill with opPhotons||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I've used the StackingAction to kill particles before upon their generation and addition to the stack, but I've also killed particles in SteppingAction before (in particular, I've killed neutrons and protons using SteppingAction after tracking each for a certain number of steps or through a certain volume).
Is there a reason that StackingAction would be preferable, because I need to use the G4Step information to determine when to kill the particle and that is readily available in my SteppingAction method?
Thank you for your time, I will review those examples closely this afternoon to see if they hold an answer to my original question.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|