|Message: Re: Energy deposited is larger than the energy of the primary gamma beam||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
The generation of optical photons does NOT conserve energy. This is explained in the manual. Therefore, you MUST NOT add the energy lost by an optical photon - however small - to your energy tally of the NaI. The simplest way to avoid this is by disallowing any and all optical photons from contributing to your energy tally logic regardless of where the steps are in your geometry. After that you should find perfect energy conservation. The energy (wavelength) of the optical photons shall be used only in connection with their optical properties.
> 2. Regarding the necessity of refractive index definition for AlHousing, > my understanding was to define this physical quantity for both materials > that form a boundary interface described via G4LogicalBorderSurface.
The index of refraction is only required for material in which you expect optical photons to propagate any finite distance; e.g. dielectric material. If you define your G4LogicalBorderSurface to be of type dielectric_metal then you don't have to provide the (complex) index of refraction of the 'metal' - unless you want the program to calculate the reflectivity from the metal's complex index of refraction. In most cases, users will simply provide an empirical reflectivity.
> 3. Regarding the reflectivity of 94% for NaI internal walls instead of > 100%: since we don't know what the reflector in a real NaI scintillator > is made of, the value of 94% seems to show the best agreement with > spectral measurement.
Sure, but that's why you are 'detecting' fewer photons than are generated.