|Message: Re: Problem with absorption length||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
> I am surprised at that since even if you give one and the same value for > all energies, an actual sampled path length should still only average to > the value you provided.
Of course I meant that in this case observable path fluctuates the average value. However if I set a table of absorption length values corresponding to energy an actual path length value lies far from the average meaning even in series of runs. Moreover this path is very small in comparison with submitted table value.
What can be incorrect?
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|