|Message: Regarding photon detection||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I have been following the LXe example so far for processing hits created at a Photomultiplier (PMT) photocathode. It has been working properly for me. However, I have been thinking as to why the following scheme would not work especially when we are interested only in one PMT, and if that is the only surface where detection takes place.
Is it not simpler to check for Detection in Stepping Action and update a counter in eventaction every time Detection takes place? Then, at the end of the event, we will have the number of PMT hits in that event. Why at all go for a sensitive detector if one is interested in only the number of photons detected? Is there any flaw in this logic?
I am asking this because, this may be much simpler than having to create a sensitive detector every time I want to count the number of photons detected in an application.
Thank you very much, Athreya
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|