Message: Re: Imaginary index and Absorption Length Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Imaginary index and Absorption Length 

Forum: Processes Involving Optical Photons
Re: Question Imaginary index and Absorption Length (Nicolas Di Vara)
Re: None Re: Imaginary index and Absorption Length (Erik Dietz-Laursonn)
Date: 10 Sep, 2012
From: Erik Dietz-Laursonn <Erik Dietz-Laursonn>

OK, I think I found the answer to my question on my own: If the reflectivity of a surface is not specified via "REFLECTIVITY" and the complex refractive index is given (by "REALRINDEX" AND "IMAGINARYRINDEX"), the surface reflectivity is calculated from the complex refractive index via the Fresnel equations. Note that this only makes sense for dielectric_metal surfaces, as the reflectivity simulates absorbing dirt for dielectric_dielectric surfaces.

As far as your question is concerned, Nicolas, I think refractive indices have no influence on the absorption length. In Geant4, the complex refractive index is a property of the surface and not of a material. Therefore, no material properties can be derived from it. If you want to specify the absorption length via the complex refractive index, you have to calculate the absorption length spectrum from the energy/wavelength dependent complex refractive index on your own and pass it to the material (via "ABSLENGTH"). I am not an expert, but this is what I found when searching for the answer to my question. Perhaps you could test if I am correct, by defining a single box without absorption length, adding a surface with complex refractive index (large imaginary part) and refractive index (otherwise optical photons may be killed) and generating optical photons in the centre of the box. If the absorption length is influenced by the complex refractive index, the photons should be absorbed directly. In the other case, they should travel through the box.

Best regards, Erik

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 Agree: Re: Imaginary index and Absorption Length   (Nicolas Di Vara - 11 Sep, 2012)
2 Question: Re: Imaginary index and Absorption Length   (cyuchiash - 08 Apr, 2014)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Imaginary index and Absorption Length"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews