|Message: Re: question regarding PMT photocathode and quantum efficiency||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I thought about my doubt a little more, and I arrived at this conclusion:
The spectral response of a PMT has a higher wavelength cut-off because of the nature of the photoelectric effect. The lower wavelength cut-off is because of the transmission characteristics of the window material. Thus, I can use the QE characteristics of the photocathode-cum-window system, provided I do NOT take into account the transmittance property of the window material, since this is already taken care of in the wavelength-dependent QE values. This I can accomplish by specifying the ABSLENGTH property of the window to a wavelength-independent arbitrarily high value.
The above solution ensures that the effect of the glass window on transmission is taken into account, as well as ensures that the possibility of reflection off the glass window-scintillator surface interface is not lost. However, if the photocathode reflectivity comes into play and the photon is reflected back into the glass window region, then, since we have not set the transmittance properties, the photon may travel around for longer than reality.
Is my reasoning correct ?
Thanks in advance,
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|