|Message: Re: Question on reflectivity definition||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Dear Wenliang Li,
The reflectivity of a dielectric_dielectric surface is calculated from Snell's Law. The empirical reflectivity you can enter with AddProperty("REFLECTIVITY" for dielectric_dielectric surfaces acts like a "dirty absorption" before Snell's Law even comes into play. With other words, reflectivity=1 (perfectly clean) is the default and what the photon does is determined by Snell's law alone (so, what is relevant are the index of refraction of the two media touching at that surface). If, on the other hand, you set reflectivity=0, the surface is so dirty that all photons are absorbed.
Please, note that for a glisur, polished surface, the G4OpticalSurface itself does not have an index of refraction (even, as in your case, you provided one). I think you mean to give the quarz the index you've given the surface. Only 'backpainted' surfaces in the UNIFIED model require their own refraction index - which in that case is the small gap layer.
I don't understand why you get for ref=0 all photons reflected. They should all be absorbed. For ref=1 photons will be refracted or reflected according to Snell's Law.
I suspect your problem is that you have not given the quarz of the finite thickness window an index of refraction. In that case, though, all photons should also be absorbed.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|