|Message: Parameter Scan of Sigma_Alpha||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I have made a scan for different values of sigma_alpha (ranging from 0.01 to 0.4) and compared the results by looking on the number of detected photons by the MPPC.
I simulated a Cherenkov tile (30x30x4 mm), a positron beam and the four available surface finishings in the UNIFIED model: ground, polished, groundbackpainted and polishedbackpainted.
The reflection parameters were all set to zero except the diffuse lobe constant I set to 1, to emphasize the surface design as an assembly of micro facets. Since sigma_alpha is never set to zero (which would account for a completely flat surface; I assume this is not achieved in reality) I describe in the legend polishedbackpainted as "ground surface with a specular reflector".
Can you explain to me, why I see such large fluctuations (especially for the data points at sigma_alph = 0.05) in case I simulate a wrapping (reflectivity 0.98) and why for sigma_alpha values smaller than 0.1 the ouput of a "ground" surface is larger than if I simulate a "polished" surface (which should produce the highest output as it is perfectly polished and ignores sigma_alpha completely). I would have expected, that the first points of the green and black line overlay, no?!
Comparing the two wrapping configurations: Why is for larger values (>0.15) of sigma_alpha the output almost equal?
Sorry for so many questions, but you'd really help me in understanding the simulation.
It might be important to keep in mind that the simulated Cherenkov photons are directional.
Thanks a lot,
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|