Message: Re: photoelctrons ??? Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: photoelctrons ??? 

Forum: Processes Involving Optical Photons
Re: None photoelctrons ??? (Davinder Siwal)
Re: Disagree Re: photoelctrons ??? (Gumplinger Peter)
Date: 18 Jan, 2011
From: Davinder Siwal <Davinder Siwal>

Hii Peter

thanks for reply

If there is no need of photoelectrons then what is the purpose of defining photocathode in geant4, beacause photocathode is something which gives photoelectrons and the overall position resolution will depend on electron space spread too ! so all I need to know is if we don't get any photoelectrons then we should define only a piece of material(PMT) at the back side of scintillator and just look at the photon striking position on this material, But this not the case in LXe example in that you specify photocathode inside the PMT and did the calculation.

I hope you understand my problem

with regard

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 Feedback: Re: photoelctrons ???   (Gumplinger Peter - 19 Jan, 2011)
(_ None: Re: photoelctrons ???   (Davinder Siwal - 19 Jan, 2011)
(_ Feedback: Re: photoelctrons ???   (Gumplinger Peter - 20 Jan, 2011)
(_ None: Re: photoelctrons ???   (Davinder Siwal - 20 Jan, 2011)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: photoelctrons ???"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews