|Message: Re: photoelctrons ???||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
thanks for reply
If there is no need of photoelectrons then what is the purpose of defining photocathode in geant4, beacause photocathode is something which gives photoelectrons and the overall position resolution will depend on electron space spread too ! so all I need to know is if we don't get any photoelectrons then we should define only a piece of material(PMT) at the back side of scintillator and just look at the photon striking position on this material, But this not the case in LXe example in that you specify photocathode inside the PMT and did the calculation.
I hope you understand my problem
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|