Message: Re: Polish and ground - where it refers finally ? Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

Feedback Re: Polish and ground - where it refers finally ? 

Forum: Processes Involving Optical Photons
Re: Sad Polish and ground - where it refers finally ? (Yuri Soloviev)
Re: Feedback Re: Polish and ground - where it refers finally ? (Gumplinger Peter)
Date: 01 May, 2010
From: Yuri Soloviev <Yuri Soloviev>

Dear Peter,

 Thank you for quick answer. 
 I still have some questions concerning  the "new" concept:

 1. If this concept is valid both to the unified and glisur model then how can I 
     define the surface of the scintillator in glisur model? 
   In unified model I would define it by setting the correspondent parameters like
   SpecularLobe etc.

 2. I guess for the glisur model the "old" concept is still valid, is it correct? 

 3. Does parameter sigmaalpha (or setpolish) refer ro the wrapper in "new" concept? 

 4. How the "ground" and "polish" should be interpreted without wrapper? 
     Or the "new" concept is valid only with wrapper ? 

 Under "new" concept I mean that the "ground" and "polish" refer to the wrapper.
 Sorry for so many questions, I just want to know what I am doing with Geant4 in my simulations.

  Have a nice weekend 
                                               Yuri

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 Disagree: Re: Polish and ground - where it refers finally ?   (Gumplinger Peter - 03 May, 2010)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Polish and ground - where it refers finally ?"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews