|Message: Re: Optical Surfaces and Sigma_Alpha||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
thank you very much for your prompt and detailed answer!
> Careful, the prob_ss etc. parameters correspond to the interface between > the scincillator and the (implied) gap of the 'backpainted' option, not > to the reflector behind the gap. This reflector is in the present > implementation always assumed to be a Lambertian reflector. If this is > not what you want, then I am afraid, you'll need to explicitly implement > the gap in geometry and the dielectric_metal surface with the reflector > as "polished" (in addition to the dielectric_dielectic interace between > scint and gap also "polished").
Thank you! - I really want to understand the implementation of the whole optical boundary process correctly, so may I ask some further questions:
a) is there a practical difference between "polishedbackpainted" and "groundbackpainted" with "prob_ss = 1.0"?
b) ... and "groundbackpainted" with "prob_sl = 1.0" + "sigma_alpha = 0.0"? (I just found out: this should be treated exactly as the case above)
c) is there a practical difference between "dielectric_metal" + "polished" and "polishedfrontpainted"?
d) I am biasing my scintillation yield down from 9200 to 92 photons/MeV and weight my results to save CPU time. Is that too much? It looks good to me, though.
> Use 100% 'specular lobe' and sigma_alpha of the order of 10deg for > diffuse and order 1-2deg for Teflon (but those are not very educated > suggestions!).
Thank you very much, these suggestions shall be educated enough for my purpose! :-)
However, that will only make sense if I define a physical air gap and set the "specular lobe" & "sigma_alpha" for the back surface, right? Because with a "painted" surface it would affect the front interface (scintillator-gap) ...
I also realised that last December similar questions were raised in this forum by Estela Suarez. I will do some tests and hope to solve some of them. Especially the comparisons between models with/without the air gap (CPU time and detection efficiency) shall be interesting.
Many thanks, Wolfgang
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|