Message: Geant vs EGS Dose-dept Disagreement Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

Question Geant vs EGS Dose-dept Disagreement 

Forum: Medical Applications
Date: 01 Dec, 2010
From: Nicole Ackerman <Nicole Ackerman>

I've been doing some simple dose simulations with GEANT, but my results disagreed when compared with a similar EGSnrc simulation. I was looking at a monoenergetic photon beam (~100 keV) going through water with a layer of another material (tungsten, for instance). For instance: 3 cm water, followed by 2 cm tungsten, then 5 cm water. The geant sim shows less initial energy deposit (I'm using the eDep scorer on a cubic mesh) than the EGS sim.

Initially I was using the Livermore physics list, and saw no difference when switching to Penelope. When I switched to EmStandardPhysics I saw my dose-depth profile become more similar to EGS in the tungsten (but the backscatter disappears). No visible difference was seen in just water. I have my cuts set to 1 nm/ 100 eV. I've attached a plot comparing the 3 physics models in Geant.

Is the problem here EGSnrc, Geant, or me? I assumed that the EmLivermore package was better for the photoelectric effect (and similar low energy studies I'm doing) and that it was sufficient on its own. Should I be using EMStandard instead/in addition? Is Geant (Livermore) getting the physics "right" and EGSnrc has it "wrong"?

I'm hoping there is a simple explanation. Thank you in advance.


Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 None: Re: Geant vs EGS Dose-dept Disagreement   (michel maire - 04 Dec, 2010)
2 None: Re: Geant vs EGS Dose-dept Disagreement   (michel maire - 14 Dec, 2010)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Geant vs EGS Dose-dept Disagreement"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews

[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]