|Message: Re: discrepancy in neutron production||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Many thanks for our response!
I'm actually not comparing the PhysicsLists for study purposes. I happen to have to different simulation sets (with the two different PhysicsLists) and I would like them to be compatible. So let me rephrase my question: What PhysicsLists yields the most accurate result when investigating the neutron- and neutron capture-count in hadronic cascades? How large are differences in the reference PhysicsLists FTFP_BERT_HP and QGSP_BERT_HP in this study? And is the PhysicsLists of Hadr06, which I attached to my first post, not suited for this purpose?