Message: Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager 

Forum: Hadronic Processes
Re: Question No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager (David Hall)
Re: None Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager (Dennis H. Wright)
Re: Idea Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager (Vladimir Ivanchenko)
Re: None Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager (David Hall)
Date: 21 Jun, 2016
From: David Hall <David Hall>

Hi Vladimir,

Sure, I can do that.

Cheers,
David


> On 21 Jun 2016, at 11:32 am, Vladimir IVANTCHENKO <vnivanch@mail.cern.ch> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> can you , please, make a short bug report in Geant4 bug report tracking system (http://bugzilla-geant4.kek.jp/process_bug.cgi)?
> 
> best regards,
> Vladimir
> 
> 
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, David Hall wrote:
> 
>> 
>> *** Discussion title: Hadronic Processes
>> 
>> Thank you for your replies, Dennis and Vladimir.
>> 
>> If the model is not able to handle nuclei with Z<=5 or Z>=100, could we
>> consider removing the warning message for these cases? The issue is that
>> we see hundreds or even thousands of these warnings in a typical medical
>> physics simulation in water. The inability of the model to handle these
>> nuclei will not affect our results, so we are only concerned about the
>> verbosity of the warnings.
>> 
>> Thanks, David
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Visit this GEANT4 at hypernews.slac.stanford.edu message (to reply or unsubscribe) at:
>> http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/hadronprocess/1544/1/1/1.html
>> 



The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]