Message: Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager 

Forum: Hadronic Processes
Re: Question No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager (David Hall)
Re: None Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager (Dennis H. Wright)
Re: Idea Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager (Vladimir Ivanchenko)
Date: 21 Jun, 2016
From: David Hall <David Hall>

Thank you for your replies, Dennis and Vladimir.

If the model is not able to handle nuclei with Z<=5 or Z>=100, could we consider removing the warning message for these cases? The issue is that we see hundreds or even thousands of these warnings in a typical medical physics simulation in water. The inability of the model to handle these nuclei will not affect our results, so we are only concerned about the verbosity of the warnings.

Thanks, David

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 None: Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager   (Hall, David Christopher - 21 Jun, 2016)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: No de-excitation for Li in G4AtomicTransitionManager"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]