Message: Re: INCLXX plus ABLA/PRECO Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum


Forum: Hadronic Processes
Re: Note INCLXX plus ABLA/PRECO (Alexey Solovyev)
Re: None Re: INCLXX plus ABLA/PRECO (Davide Mancusi)
Date: 04 Mar, 2016
From: Alexey Solovyev <Alexey Solovyev>

Thank you for you kind explanation. But now I have one thing to clarify: if I instantiate only G4INCLXXInterface (e.g. in my ConstructProcess) with no other models and than using G4AblaInterface (no matter with messenger or directly), what will be used for <1 MeV region? Still PreCompound despite the fact I instantite ABLA or nothing and resulting in wrong/long simulation results (and so I might need to instantite something to this energy range)?

Manual page was from 10.2 judging by number at the bottom, sorry if it was confusing. But what I also experienced in 10.2 (comparing to 10.1p02, didn't tried 10.2.p01 nor 10.1.p03 yet) that INCL-based physics (tested QGSP_INCLXX and G4HadronPhysicsINCLXX+G4IonINCLXXPhysics) are much more memory consumable (SLC6, gcc49, MT mode, assuming ofc all my user code remains the same).

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 None: Re: INCLXX plus ABLA/PRECO   (Davide Mancusi - 04 Mar, 2016)
(_ None: Re: INCLXX plus ABLA/PRECO   (Alexey Solovyev - 04 Mar, 2016)
(_ None: Re: INCLXX plus ABLA/PRECO   (Davide Mancusi - 04 Mar, 2016)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: INCLXX plus ABLA/PRECO"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews

[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]