|Message: Wrong branching ratio in Boron-10 neutron capture||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I'm trying to verify to the hadronic physics processes for a boron lined neutron detector but I'm coming up with a problem. The dominant decay from thermal neutron capture on boron-10 should be alpha(1.47MeV) + Li7(0.84MeV) at 94% but I never see this process occuring. Instead, I see only the suppressed decay channel where the reaction produces alpha(1.78MeV) + Li7(1.01MeV) which is supposed to only occur 6% of the time.
This is important because I'm working to characterize the response of gas filled detectors where signals are proportional to dE/dx and as it stands 2 possible signal variations are not occuring. The energy loss in the gas volume seems to be occuring as expected at least.
I'm using geant4.9.4p02 with the GNDL4.2 data libraries. I'm also using the QGSP_BERT_HP physics list to cover the hadronic stuff.
I'm thinking there's either a subtle issue with either the GNDL data or the way I've defined my neutron capture material but I've varied the material definition and implementation and the results are always the same.
Any ideas are appreciated!
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|