|Message: Re: Strange behaviors of the NeutronHPInelastic process using Lithium||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
First thank you very much for your effort!
I tried to use your physicsList for my case. The compiler shows that the GammaPhysics.hh and EmStandardPhysics.hh not found, I replace them with in /example/extend/Hadronic/Hadr03/GammaPhysics.hh and G4EmStandardPhysics.hh.
Unfortunately, the result I got using my code is still quite the same.
As you said, it quite difficult to compared your and my results. Perhaps you can attach your code or send to me firstname.lastname@example.org, so I can extract results using the same way.
BTW, in order to compare with MCNP result, I assume the Li7 density of 1.0g/cm3 (not 1.85 g/cm3), and volume of 1 cm3 (means no need to divide results with volume). I score the track length of neutrons (we call it Neutron Flux, different from Number of Neutrons), and separate total track length into 260 energy bins to get the spectrum. Final result in each bin is divide by Delta Energy (energy normalization). Perhaps these information is useful for you.
Best regards, Yuefeng
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:39:10 GMT, michel maire wrote:
> I tried to repeat your exercice. Plots in attachment. The comparison is not easy: not the same scale, not the same normalisation,..etc.. > But we can say that Li7 distribution seems compatible with yours, but not Li6. > I attach also PhysicsList, and log files. > > Attachment: > http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/AUX/2014/03/16/09.36-91969-Li7.gif > http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/AUX/2014/03/16/09.36-70868-Li6.gif > http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/AUX/2014/03/16/09.36-23182-PhysicsList.cc.txt > http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/AUX/2014/03/16/09.36-35367-Li7.log.txt > http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/AUX/2014/03/16/09.36-23526-Li6.log.txt >