|Message: Problem neutron time-of-flight simulation||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I simulate a neutron time-of-flight spectrometer using the QGSP_BERT_HP physics list and have encountered a problem (geant4-09-05-patch-01). The time-of-flight is between two sensitive volumes, (S1PV and S2PV), the first volume is positioned in a neutron beam and the second volume is positioned with an angle and some distance away from the in-beam one. By using my own SteppingAction class I retrieve the time, using GetGlobalTime, when neutrons interact in these volumes.
For one incoming neutron, interacting in both volumes, the time-of-flight is constructed by subtracting the time from the second volume with the time obtained from the in-beam volume. The problem I encountered is that the time-of-flight I get by subtracting these two times from each other do not agree with the time I get if I calculate the time-of-flight analytically, the time-of-flight from simulations is shorter than the time-of-flight from analytical calculations. It seems to me that the true flight path of the scattered neutron is not taken into account.
I also attach results of one source neutron the scatter ones in the in-beam volume and ones in the second volume, which can be compared with an analytical calculation. The extra text in the attached file is the information generated from my own SteppingAction class, used for the time-of-flight calculation.
Hope someone have the time to look in to this problem or explain what Iím doing wrong.
I have also tried to use version 9.6.0 and get the same result.