|Message: problem with radioactive decay of 235U||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I have encountered a problem when simulating the radioactive decay of 235U using G4RadioactiveDecay, which may be similar to those I reported in this forum (post #1147) and as a bug report at http://bugzilla-geant4.kek.jp/show_bug.cgi?id=1186, in the sense that I do not obtain the emissions I expect.
In this case I am simulating for a large NaI detector 235U decays in an external component (photomultiplier). I enclose the registered energy spectrum for 10^6 decays of 235U, stopping the radioactive decay of the daughter.
So I would expect to register no alpha emission, and for the gamma emissions, the most intense lines are, according to 235U decay scheme, those of 185.7 and 143.8 keV.
However, in the registered spectrum the largest peaks are clearly those of 205 and 163 keV.
I am using geant4.9.4.p01 version and I have checked at file /data/RadioactiveDecay3.3/z92.a235 that the probabilities of decay to the different excited states of the daughter nucleus are as I expect, so it seems that there could be some problem in the simulation of the daughter nucleus deexcitation.
Thank you very much once more.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|