|Message: Re: Problems in the time sequence of the radioactive decay of 232Th and 238U chains||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
thanks a lot for your answer.
In fact I was already controlling the time of the decay products (electron, alphas...), not only of the radioactive nuclei. My problem is that for example for the 214Bi-214Po sequence in the 238U chain, the alpha from Po is detected at exactly the same time that the electron from Bi, which is not real.
In any case, I checked that changing the definition of hit times from PreStepPoint to PostStepTime does not solve the problem.
Thanks again and best regards,
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:32:40 GMT, Vladimir Ivanchenko wrote:
> Hello, > > Time at PreStepPoint is always before the decay. If decay happens > on-fly, one have to take time in PostStepPoint, if AtRest - I am not > sure. At lease, I would look into time of the decay products and not of > the primary. > > VI >
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|