Message: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes 

Keywords: Parameterisation
Forum: Geometry
Re: Question Parameterisation vs. many Boxes (Lucas Clemente)
Re: None Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes (Joseph Perl)
Date: 27 Jan, 2008
From: Lucas Clemente <Lucas Clemente>

Thanks for your reply. I just looked for NestedParameterisation, but I couldn't find a document describing it.

G4RegularNavigation looks interesting, is there any tutorial or paper on it? I could only find the software-reference (http://geant4.cern.ch/bin/SRM/G4GenDoc.exe.pl?flag=2&FileName=G4RegularNavigation.hh&FileDir=source/geometry/navigation/include), but it doesn't tell how to apply it. Do you know what kind of improvement comes along with the application of a G4RegularNavigation?

I also searched the Medial Applications Forum, but couldn't find any useful information either...

Another optimization would be to replace little voxels of the same material by a bigger volume to reduce the memory needed. Is there any existing approach?

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 More: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Gabriele Cosmo - 27 Jan, 2008)
3 None: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Joseph Perl - 27 Jan, 2008)
1 None: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Lucas Clemente - 27 Jan, 2008)
1 None: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Joseph Perl - 27 Jan, 2008)
...
3 None: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Joseph Perl - 27 Jan, 2008)
... 2 Message(s)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]