Message: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes 

Keywords: Parameterisation
Forum: Geometry
Re: Question Parameterisation vs. many Boxes (Lucas Clemente)
Date: 26 Jan, 2008
From: Joseph Perl <Joseph Perl>

Yes, parameterisation is a much better way to go than using many little G4Boxes.

However, you should probably use something more sophisiticated than a simple parameterisation.

Better approaches for DICOM include either:

1) NestedParameterizaton


2) the newer, still somewhat experimental (just since many of us have not yet tried it) G4RegularNavigation

For either of these issues, start by looking for information in the Medical Applications Forum. You are not the first person to work on DICOM issues for Geant4, and while there is still much room for improvement, you will find many other users interested in sharing their thoughts in that forum.

You can also find talks from recent tutorials or colaboration meetings on these topics Just start with Google, but let me know if you get stuck and I can try to dig out more detailed references for you.

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 None: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Lucas Clemente - 27 Jan, 2008)
1 More: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Gabriele Cosmo - 27 Jan, 2008)
3 None: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Joseph Perl - 27 Jan, 2008)
1 None: Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes   (Lucas Clemente - 27 Jan, 2008)
... 4 Message(s)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Parameterisation vs. many Boxes"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews

[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]