|Message: Re: Is it possible to change the geometry during the tracking of a particle?||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Context of the question: GATE for system design in SPECT
Problem: tracking in parametrised volumes
In SPECT a detector is typically made of a scintillator capturing gammas emitted from a patient tracer. In front of such a detector is a lead block with circa 150.000 air holes. In parallel beam applications all these holes have an identical form and are aligned along a rectangular grid. We can model such a parallel beam collimator using arrays (repeaters) or using G4 replicas. Both options are available in GATE but for distributed computing only replicas are used since building the geometry goes fast (almost no overhead on a cluster).
However, next to parallel beam applications, we are also applying fan and cone beam collimators; respectively oriented towards a focal line and a focal spot. Hence, every individual hole has another form/orientation which can be precalculated and described in a closed analytical expression. To model such collimators we use G4 parametrised volumes. Building the geometry goes fast and flawless. The tracking however is multiple orders slower, probably because every time a particle hits the collimator every form and distance is recalculated.
We are designing a "flying hole array" which only takes the 20 neighbouring holes around the interaction site into account. This is however a limitation if the energy of the gammas increases which allows them to travel through many of the lead lamella, crossing over multiple holes (not known before how many holes).
So before to implement the flying hole array we want to make sure the property of the geometry in Geant4. Now we know the geometry can't be changed within a run. If you have any advise or suggestion, we really appreciate it.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|