|Message: Re: Problems with Subtraction Solids||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 21:52:58 GMT, Bruno wrote:
> Hi! I'm trying to subtract two solids and am getting a error message (the one I believe one would get from overlapping two surfaces, but I believe I am not doing so. I tried various debugging methods, and changed quantities here and there without results. The error is: > Polyhedron not available for pPTFE05StockUpperCutTubSub1 > Touchable path: Laboratory 0 PTFE05 0 > This means it cannot be visualized on most systems (try RayTracer). > 1) The solid may not have implemented the CreatePolyhedron method. > 2) For Boolean solids, the BooleanProcessor, which attempts to create > the resultant polyhedron, may have failed.
It looks like you're doing this under Geant4 10.3. The default number of line segments used to approximate circles (cylinders, cones, etc.) was changed in 10.3 from 24 to 72, which can cause visualization problems like this. One thing to try is the macro command
If this fixes your visualization, then you can move on to validate the physics. If not, checking for overlaps, coincident surfaces, etc., is probably your next step. Be warned that the visualization system has problems with Boolean solids which are not well understood, and not easy to solve.
-- Michael Kelsey
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|