|Message: Simulation improvements with replicated volumes||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Hi, I am trying to optimize a simple geometry made by many adjacent scintillating fibers. As a first approach, I created a G4PVPlacement for each fiber. Then I looked for something more sophisticated and replaced the G4PVPlacements with a single G4PVParameterised. I was (naively) expecting that this would generate a speedup in simulation but my preliminary tests show that there is almost no difference in speed.
Digging into the code, I had some hints that during tracking only the regular geometry made by voxels is used. This would mean that using many G4PVPlacement or a single G4PVParameterised or G4PVReplica to describe the same geometry will lead to the same simulation time (albeit an improvement in memory utilization can be achieved). Is this correct?
Sorry for the naive question, thanks.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|