Message: Re: NIST Material vs G4Material Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: NIST Material vs G4Material 

Forum: Geometry
Re: None NIST Material vs G4Material (Jérôme Roccaz)
Re: None Re: NIST Material vs G4Material (michel maire)
Re: More Re: NIST Material vs G4Material (Jérôme Roccaz)
Date: 24 Apr, 2012
From: michel maire <michel maire>

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:17:16 GMT, J&#65533;r&#65533;me Roccaz wrote:

> I use hadronic interaction so ... As a conclusion, I should use NIST
> constructor. As I want to add other element, like boron to my PEHD, I
> should use both NIST definition for PEHD and Boron and then build the
> material, right?

    right
> 
> By the way, for a gaz mixture like Ar + N2 in ionization chamber, better
> is to use NIST or G4Element so to have "more realistic" ionization
> results?

  does not matter

     Michel

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: NIST Material vs G4Material"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]