|Message: density or dimensions: that is the question||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
in my geometry i have a complex detector casing (walls, cables, different layers of different materials..) so I have decided to simplify the design creating a box with the dimension of my detector casing, and creating a new material "DC" this way
G4Material* DC =new G4Material("Detector Case",density=DC_density,ncomponents=5); DC->AddMaterial(Al, fractionmass=Al_fraction); DC->AddMaterial(Cu, fractionmass=Cu_fraction); DC->AddMaterial(Nb, fractionmass=Nb_fraction); DC->AddMaterial(Ti, fractionmass=Ti_fraction); DC->AddMaterial(MuMetal, fractionmass=MuMetal_fraction);
i was tempted to define DC_density as:
G4double DH_density = Al_density*Al_fraction+Cu_density*Cu_fraction+Nb_density*Nb_fraction+Ti_density*Ti_fraction+MuMetal_fraction*MuMetal_density;
but this way the total mass of the detector case is way too much (because the actual volume has a lot of void space inside it)
my question is: is it safer to use the actual dimension and a fake density that gives the correct total mass, or the real mass with a thinner detector case?
according to me it should be exactly the same thing, but in my group there are different opinions on the matter, and i'd like to hear the opinion of someone that knows better how the software works
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|