Message: Re: About Volumes and Tracks Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: About Volumes and Tracks 

Forum: Event and Track Management
Re: None About Volumes and Tracks (Mike L)
Re: Feedback Re: About Volumes and Tracks (Gumplinger Peter)
Date: 27 Jun, 2007
From: michel maire <michel maire>

User Peter Gumplinger wrote:
>> Michel is the greater expert,
>> but what happens if the multiple scattering step limitation in water is
>> larger than the sub-block size. In this case, the 'trajectories' -
>> straight lines connecting step-points - would be more zig-zag than in
>> the homogeneous case because the multiple scattering angles and lateral
>> displacements are now calculated based on the geometrical step length.
   I wanted to underline that it is more efficient to limit the step
   'by hand' (for example G4StepLimiter) rather than use artificial
   geometrical boudaries : step limit can be applied to charged particle

   In TestEm11, we try to demonstrate that dose profile is the same with
   StepMax (run01.mac) and replica (run02.mac)


Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: About Volumes and Tracks"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews

[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]