|Message: Re: alternative to scoring planes||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
I have not experienced different counting rates depending on material types, other than what you might expect from double counting when you count a gamma once and then a second time if it scatters back.
I assume you also have no physics processes on? It might be an idea to do a few checks on the track's attributes before you count it - such as a check on momentum direction (to make sure it isn't backscattered) or do a check on the process that created it and make sure its what you expect.
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|