Message: Re: Losing characteristic radiation, where is problem? Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Losing characteristic radiation, where is problem? 

Forum: Event and Track Management
Re: Question Losing characteristic radiation, where is problem? (Hayk Gabrielyan)
Re: None Re: Losing characteristic radiation, where is problem? (Vladimir IVANTCHENKO )
Re: Question Re: Losing characteristic radiation, where is problem? (Hayk Gabrielyan)
Date: 30 Aug, 2005
From: Vladimir IVANTCHENKO <vnivanch@mail.cern.ch>

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Hayk Gabrielyan wrote:

> *** Discussion title: Event and Track Management
> Email replies to PublicHyperNews@slac.stanford.edu must include:
>   In-Reply-To: <"/eventtrackmanage/374/1/1"@geant4-hn.slac.stanford.edu>
>   Subject: ...change this to be about your reply.
> 
> Dear Vladimir IVANTCHENKO!
> 
> thank you for fast reply.
> 
> But I have a question again. I am "gathering" energy deposit of gammas
> via electron kinetic energies. I've an initial gamma, after interacting
> (photo, compton effects), I get electrons. I am summarizing initial
> kinetic energies of electrons and kill them. I thought, that I must get
> more precised data. But as I've mentioned above in my topic, nearly 10%
> of the electrons which I must get from the electron conversion from high
> shells (N,M) to K shell (interval ~28-29keV)gammas, but I haven't. In
> other 90% of acts, that gammas (28-29keV) appear, with the following
> photoeffect and electron emission.
> 
> I want to understand, why I am getting this result? Is there a logical
> mistake?
> 
> thank you again
> 
Hello,

If you are using standard package, then no atomic deexcitation is
simulated. If you are using lowenergy, then fluorescence is active by
default with the default energy threshold 250 eV. To have a complete
deexcitation simulated one has to activate also Auger production and
establish needed thresholds for dexcitation gamma and Auger electrons.

If you are sure that deexcitation is active and threshold are on the level
you want and there is no existing lines in the final spectrum, then it may
be a subject of a bug report.

VI

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Losing characteristic radiation, where is problem?"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]