Message: Re: Removing secondaries to save memory Not Logged In (login)
 Next-in-Thread Next-in-Thread
 Next-in-Forum Next-in-Forum

None Re: Removing secondaries to save memory 

Forum: Event and Track Management
Re: Question Removing secondaries to save memory (Giles Reid)
Date: 15 May, 2005
From: Makoto Asai <Makoto Asai>

Secondary tracks should not consume too much memory. I presume you store
trajectories of all secondaries, which might be the real reason of your
memory consumption. I would suggest not to store trajectories for 
secondaries. Refer ExN04TrackingAction.

Inline Depth:
 1 1
 All All
Outline Depth:
 1 1
 2 2
 All All
Add message: (add)

1 Question: Re: Removing secondaries to save memory   (Giles Reid - 16 May, 2005)
(_ None: Re: Removing secondaries to save memory   (michel maire - 17 May, 2005)
(_ Question: Re: Removing secondaries to save memory   (Giles Reid - 17 May, 2005)
 Add Message Add Message
to: "Re: Removing secondaries to save memory"

 Subscribe Subscribe

This site runs SLAC HyperNews version 1.11-slac-98, derived from the original HyperNews


[ Geant 4 Home | Geant 4 HyperNews | Search | Request New Forum | Feedback ]