|Message: Re: Does the postpone stack induce cross section bias?||Not Logged In (login)|
Click on the Forum title, e.g. on the "Forums by Category" page, to read a sequence of postings to the Forum and its threads all in one page. If you are only interested in one thread or the thread following a specific posting, click the thread or the posting, which takes you to a smaller page, which contains only the part you are interested in and may be easier to navigate.
Messages are "chained" if there are only replies at the first level, i.e. 1/1.html, 1/1/1.html etc. In case of "chained" messages the message number is replaced by the icon and there is no indentation.
Inline: Display the subject line only or also the text of the posting(s); for the choice "All" the "Outline" choices are switched off.
|1||0||1||no text / full text of posting|
|2||1||All||text for level 1 only / text for All postings|
Outline: Choose the depth of the posting thread, successive toggle controls provide increasing detail.
|1||2||1||2 levels / 1 level (original posting)|
|2||3||2||3 levels / 2 levels|
|3||3||All||3 levels / all levels (all postings)|
Hi Evan, Postponing a track to the next event will just do this and will not cause bias. The track is taken as it is (time, position, energy, etc.) and put in the stack. In the next event, it will be taken back as it is and be tracked. Doing so does not introduce any bias. The track "does not know" (and does not need to know) in what event it is tracked, and from the point of view of the track (and of the physics applied to it), the event "partitioning" is somewhat arbitrary. It would be true that the postponing would introduce a bias if the track characteristics would be changed : for example assume that the event would give "the time" T0 of all primary tracks, then keeping artificially alive a track by postponing it would bias its lifetime. But this is not the way it is. (And for the case of the time, for example, it is carried by the primary vertices the primary tracks originate from, and an event may have several of them, each having its own time.) Cheers, Marc On 11/05/2016 15:29, Evan Rand wrote: > *** Discussion title: Event and Track Management > > Hi G4Experts, > > Does the postpone stack induce cross section bias? In my case I'm using > the postpone stack with hadronic physics (ParticleHP). > > For example, if I stop a particle in the stepping action at some time > (t0), and then send the track to postpone stack. When the track starts > during the next event, will the track have a complete knowledge of its > history? For example, does it know how many steps it made in the > previous event, and therefore correctly calculate the probably of a > hadronic event for the next step? Or does the postpone stack create a > NEW track at every event, and therefore the tracks lose their history > and induce some form of a cross section bias. > > Thanks in advance for any help, Cheers, Evan > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Visit this GEANT4 at hypernews.slac.stanford.edu message (to reply or unsubscribe) at: > http://hypernews.slac.stanford.edu/HyperNews/geant4/get/eventtrackmanage/1307.html
|Inline Depth:||Outline Depth:||Add message:|